<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making Wine 1.2 Fresh</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yokozar.org/blog/archives/225/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yokozar.org/blog/archives/225</link>
	<description>A blog about Ubuntu, Wine, and the occasional other interest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:16:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sven</title>
		<link>http://yokozar.org/blog/archives/225/comment-page-1#comment-6608</link>
		<dc:creator>Sven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 09:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yokozar.org/blog/?p=225#comment-6608</guid>
		<description>Mail send ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mail send &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YokoZar</title>
		<link>http://yokozar.org/blog/archives/225/comment-page-1#comment-6607</link>
		<dc:creator>YokoZar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 01:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yokozar.org/blog/?p=225#comment-6607</guid>
		<description>Sven, you can email them to me, I maintain the thumbnailer package.  Check the contact link above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sven, you can email them to me, I maintain the thumbnailer package.  Check the contact link above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sven</title>
		<link>http://yokozar.org/blog/archives/225/comment-page-1#comment-6606</link>
		<dc:creator>Sven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 00:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yokozar.org/blog/?p=225#comment-6606</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I&#039;ve no idea whether it makes sense to ask that here, but anyway:

1.) I think I just fixed a little bug in the exe-thumbnailer script, and would contribute it. Whom do I have to get in touch with?

2.) I have done some rearrangements of the overlay version number. I think it reads far better now and is less obstructive. If somebody is interested...

3.) It should be rather easy to implement some flags  to select whether one wants overlay version number or even the background wine glass. If there&#039;s interest I&#039;d do that...

4.) Is there a reason why the python routine to clean the filename was chosen over a simple basename. The latter is installed everywhere (AFAIK), while python is not...

Ah... Before I forget: Great idea, great script - Thanks!! ;)

Regards!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I&#8217;ve no idea whether it makes sense to ask that here, but anyway:</p>
<p>1.) I think I just fixed a little bug in the exe-thumbnailer script, and would contribute it. Whom do I have to get in touch with?</p>
<p>2.) I have done some rearrangements of the overlay version number. I think it reads far better now and is less obstructive. If somebody is interested&#8230;</p>
<p>3.) It should be rather easy to implement some flags  to select whether one wants overlay version number or even the background wine glass. If there&#8217;s interest I&#8217;d do that&#8230;</p>
<p>4.) Is there a reason why the python routine to clean the filename was chosen over a simple basename. The latter is installed everywhere (AFAIK), while python is not&#8230;</p>
<p>Ah&#8230; Before I forget: Great idea, great script &#8211; Thanks!! <img src='http://yokozar.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Regards!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YokoZar</title>
		<link>http://yokozar.org/blog/archives/225/comment-page-1#comment-6605</link>
		<dc:creator>YokoZar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 22:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yokozar.org/blog/?p=225#comment-6605</guid>
		<description>Decentralist, the sound issues in question are known and split across several bug reports because they are caused by multiple reasons.  It&#039;s not being ignored, it&#039;s just easier to manage bugs when they&#039;re split up by code issue rather than user-visible symptom.

If we didn&#039;t do it this way we&#039;d end up never closing bugs like &quot;iTunes doesn&#039;t work&quot; and the bug tracker would become rather useless for coordinating on all the different underlying reasons why it doesn&#039;t work.  Each API needs its own set of patches and tests, and thus its own set of debugging - hence different bug numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Decentralist, the sound issues in question are known and split across several bug reports because they are caused by multiple reasons.  It&#8217;s not being ignored, it&#8217;s just easier to manage bugs when they&#8217;re split up by code issue rather than user-visible symptom.</p>
<p>If we didn&#8217;t do it this way we&#8217;d end up never closing bugs like &#8220;iTunes doesn&#8217;t work&#8221; and the bug tracker would become rather useless for coordinating on all the different underlying reasons why it doesn&#8217;t work.  Each API needs its own set of patches and tests, and thus its own set of debugging &#8211; hence different bug numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: decentralist</title>
		<link>http://yokozar.org/blog/archives/225/comment-page-1#comment-6604</link>
		<dc:creator>decentralist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 21:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yokozar.org/blog/?p=225#comment-6604</guid>
		<description>There is a huge regression that worked fine in 1.0.  Specifically, bug 21609. Although a patch was committed and the bug marked as resolved/fixed, it did not fix hardly any of the applications suffering from the regression.  So the remaining 99% of the regression was exiled to the new bug 23249 which has not been marked as as a Wine 1.2 target although it needs to be considered a major release blocker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a huge regression that worked fine in 1.0.  Specifically, bug 21609. Although a patch was committed and the bug marked as resolved/fixed, it did not fix hardly any of the applications suffering from the regression.  So the remaining 99% of the regression was exiled to the new bug 23249 which has not been marked as as a Wine 1.2 target although it needs to be considered a major release blocker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly Clowers</title>
		<link>http://yokozar.org/blog/archives/225/comment-page-1#comment-6549</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Clowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 07:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yokozar.org/blog/?p=225#comment-6549</guid>
		<description>Seems to me that Wine sound has been pretty good lately, at least on my setup: Debian Sid, PA, and Wine from http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-wine/ppa/ubuntu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me that Wine sound has been pretty good lately, at least on my setup: Debian Sid, PA, and Wine from <a href="http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-wine/ppa/ubuntu" rel="nofollow">http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-wine/ppa/ubuntu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YokoZar</title>
		<link>http://yokozar.org/blog/archives/225/comment-page-1#comment-6548</link>
		<dc:creator>YokoZar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 05:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yokozar.org/blog/?p=225#comment-6548</guid>
		<description>Van that&#039;s correct at the moment, I don&#039;t know how KDE uses thumbnails but if it&#039;s similar to Gnome then the script should be easy to port for a KDE person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Van that&#8217;s correct at the moment, I don&#8217;t know how KDE uses thumbnails but if it&#8217;s similar to Gnome then the script should be easy to port for a KDE person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Van</title>
		<link>http://yokozar.org/blog/archives/225/comment-page-1#comment-6547</link>
		<dc:creator>Van</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 03:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yokozar.org/blog/?p=225#comment-6547</guid>
		<description>gnome-exe-thumbnailer? So it will only work with Gnome? No luck for KDE users?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gnome-exe-thumbnailer? So it will only work with Gnome? No luck for KDE users?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YokoZar</title>
		<link>http://yokozar.org/blog/archives/225/comment-page-1#comment-6546</link>
		<dc:creator>YokoZar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yokozar.org/blog/?p=225#comment-6546</guid>
		<description>Christian: Add Wine PPA, apt-get source gnome-exe-thumbnailer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christian: Add Wine PPA, apt-get source gnome-exe-thumbnailer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aigars Mahinovs</title>
		<link>http://yokozar.org/blog/archives/225/comment-page-1#comment-6539</link>
		<dc:creator>Aigars Mahinovs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yokozar.org/blog/?p=225#comment-6539</guid>
		<description>Many years have now passed with Wine not supporting pulse in Ubuntu. It does not look likely that OpenAL will be merged before the Ubuntu 10.10 freeze. And even if OpenAL patches are ready, they can not be well tested in this limited time. So IMHO it would be wiser to merge winepulse patches that work now (and have worked for years) and then, when OpenAL patches are ready test and merge those.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many years have now passed with Wine not supporting pulse in Ubuntu. It does not look likely that OpenAL will be merged before the Ubuntu 10.10 freeze. And even if OpenAL patches are ready, they can not be well tested in this limited time. So IMHO it would be wiser to merge winepulse patches that work now (and have worked for years) and then, when OpenAL patches are ready test and merge those.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

